Industry
Every second of downtime happens in front of a paying customer.
Retail and e-commerce run on a handful of days that carry the rest of the year, a checkout path that cannot afford friction, and payment data that becomes a target the moment it is collected. Gryffin secures storefronts and payment environments under real sale-day load, defends the checkout and login paths from automated abuse, and protects customer data at a scale few other industries reach.
Industry Challenges
Traffic spikes that look exactly like an attack
Sale events and seasonal peaks multiply legitimate traffic by orders of magnitude within hours, and infrastructure sized for an average day has to hold without mistaking real customers for a flood.
A checkout path with zero tolerance for friction
Every additional control is tested against conversion. Fraud and bot defences have to work invisibly, because the business cannot survive a safeguard that costs it sales.
Payment data that is a target the moment it is collected
Cardholder data moving through storefronts, payment gateways and loyalty platforms creates a compliance obligation most retailers underestimate until an assessment finds it everywhere.
Customer data at a volume few other industries reach
Accounts, order history, loyalty profiles and marketing consent accumulate fast, and a breach notification reaches more people, more publicly, than in almost any other industry.
PCI DSS obligations apply from the moment card data is accepted, stored or transmitted, regardless of retailer size, and consumer data protection requirements layer on top of it. Engagements begin by mapping exactly where card and customer data flow before anything is assessed.
Services
The cheapest control is the one you took out of scope.
Most PCI DSS programmes are expensive because too much of the estate is in scope. Gryffin starts by mapping where cardholder data actually flows, then reduces the assessed environment through tokenisation, redirection and segmentation before implementing controls - because every system removed from scope is a system you never have to assess, monitor or evidence again.
What the engagement covers.
Cardholder data discovery and flow mapping
Establishing where card data enters, is processed, transmitted and stored - including the copies nobody documented.
Scope reduction design
Tokenisation, redirection, outsourced capture and architectural change to remove systems from the cardholder data environment entirely.
Network segmentation and validation
Segmentation design between the CDE and the rest of the estate, plus the segmentation penetration testing PCI DSS requires to prove it holds.
Control implementation
Implementation across the applicable requirements - access control, logging and monitoring, encryption, vulnerability management, secure development and change control.
Evidence preparation and SAQ/ROC support
Assembling the evidence set, completing the appropriate self-assessment questionnaire, or preparing for a QSA-led Report on Compliance.
Ongoing compliance operations
Quarterly scanning, annual testing, log review and the recurring obligations that keep compliance continuous rather than annual.
What you receive
Scope reduction first, controls second
We treat scope as the primary lever. Reducing the cardholder data environment lowers assessment cost, monitoring cost and breach exposure simultaneously - and it is work most programmes skip.
Segmentation we can prove
Our testers validate segmentation independently of the engineers who built it, which is both a PCI requirement and the only honest way to confirm the boundary holds.
Implementation and assessment support under one roof
Gryffin's engineers deploy the logging, encryption, access control and monitoring the standard requires, so the gap between the requirement and a working control does not become your problem to solve.
Continuous, not annual
The controls are instrumented for continuous evidence, so quarterly and annual obligations are checkpoints rather than a scramble.
Illustrative. Scenarios drawn from common engagement patterns.
An entire network in scope
A service provider asked for evidence by its acquirer
Compliant on paper, failing quarterly scans
Secure the software you actually ship.
Application security works when it arrives as engineering work rather than as a late objection. Gryffin builds enterprise software as core business, which shapes how we secure it: threat modelling before code, protection at the edge for what is already running, and testing wired into the pipeline at thresholds that block real risk without blocking releases.
What the engagement covers.
Threat modelling and secure design
Structured threat modelling on new and changing systems, producing security requirements that enter the backlog as engineering work.
API discovery and inventory
Finding the real API surface - including undocumented, legacy and shadow endpoints - before anything is protected, because you cannot defend what is not on the list.
API gateway protection
Schema enforcement, authentication and authorisation controls, rate limiting and abuse monitoring implemented at the gateway.
WAF and bot management
Web application firewall deployment and rule tuning, plus bot mitigation separating credential stuffing, scraping and inventory abuse from legitimate traffic.
DevSecOps pipeline integration
SAST, DAST, software composition analysis and secret scanning wired into CI/CD with gates calibrated to your risk appetite and release cadence.
Secure development enablement
Coding standards, secure component libraries and developer training targeted at the vulnerability classes your codebase actually produces.
What you receive
Built by people who ship software
Gryffin delivers custom applications, enterprise systems and APIs. Security controls are designed by engineers who have operated the same kinds of systems, which is why they survive contact with a delivery team.
Gates calibrated to ship
A pipeline that fails builds on low-severity findings gets bypassed within a month. We tune thresholds so the gate blocks what matters and stays trusted.
Discovery before protection
Most API exposure is on endpoints nobody remembered. Inventory comes first, every time.
Findings taught back to the team
Enablement sessions are built from vulnerabilities found in your own codebase, not from generic material. Developers fix classes of bug rather than instances.
Illustrative. Scenarios drawn from common engagement patterns.
Credential stuffing that looked like normal traffic
A manual security review before every release
An API surface larger than anyone believed
Someone is watching at 3am. And they answer.
Attacks do not arrive during office hours; they arrive when nobody is looking. A managed SOC gives you continuous coverage without staffing three shifts - but only if the detection content is built for your environment and the escalation arrives with an investigation already attached. Gryffin builds the detection, runs the monitoring, and escalates with a recommendation rather than a raw alert.
What the engagement covers.
Log source onboarding and normalisation
Identifying the telemetry that matters, onboarding it, and normalising it so correlation is possible across endpoint, identity, network, cloud and application sources.
Detection engineering
Detection content written and tuned for your environment and industry, mapped to MITRE ATT&CK, with coverage gaps documented rather than glossed over.
24x7 monitoring and triage
Continuous analyst coverage with alert triage, enrichment and investigation before anything reaches you.
Escalation and response support
Agreed escalation paths, severity definitions and response-time commitments, with pre-authorised containment actions where you want them.
Threat hunting
Scheduled hypothesis-driven hunts looking for what the detections would have missed, feeding new content back into the platform.
Reporting and coverage review
Monthly operational reporting and quarterly coverage review against ATT&CK, with a roadmap for closing remaining gaps.
What you receive
Detection built for you, not shipped as defaults
Default SIEM content produces volume, not value. Our engineers build and tune detections against your log sources and business processes, and we measure the true-positive rate rather than the alert count.
Coverage you can see
Detection coverage is mapped against MITRE ATT&CK, so you know which techniques you would catch, which you would miss, and what closing each gap costs. Nobody has to take the coverage claim on trust.
Escalations that arrive with an answer
An alert reaches you triaged, enriched and with a recommended action. Where you have pre-authorised containment, the action has already been taken and you are told what and why.
Bring your own platform, or ours
We operate on Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk, QRadar, Elastic and others. If you have already invested in a platform, the engagement starts by making it work rather than replacing it.
Illustrative. Scenarios drawn from common engagement patterns.
A SIEM nobody reads any more
No out-of-hours coverage at all
A security team spending its time on triage
One control model, whichever cloud they chose.
Cloud environments do not drift because engineers are careless; they drift because change is fast and guardrails are absent. Gryffin establishes a control model that applies across every account and every provider, deploys posture management that catches drift as it happens, and routes findings to the people who can actually fix them.
What the engagement covers.
Posture assessment across accounts
Assessment of every account and subscription against CIS benchmarks and your own policy - identity, network exposure, storage permissions, encryption, logging and key management.
Landing zone and guardrails
Account structure, preventive guardrails, baseline logging and identity design so new environments start compliant rather than being remediated later.
CSPM deployment and integration
Continuous posture monitoring with drift detection, severity-based routing to owners, and integration with your ticketing so findings enter existing workflows.
Workload, container and Kubernetes security
Image scanning, admission control, runtime protection and workload identity for what runs inside the cluster, not just the account around it.
Cloud access and data protection
CASB and DLP for sanctioned and unsanctioned cloud application use, with classification driving policy on what may leave.
Multi-cloud consistency
One control model applied across AWS, Azure, Google Cloud and private infrastructure, with divergence documented where a platform genuinely differs.
What you receive
We build on these platforms already
Gryffin delivers cloud application development and enterprise workloads as core business. Cloud security recommendations come from people who have run production on the same services.
Findings that reach an owner
A posture tool that reports to nobody changes nothing. We map accounts and workloads to owning teams and route findings into the ticketing system they already use.
Preventive before detective
Guardrails that stop a misconfiguration being created are worth more than alerts about it afterwards. We push controls left into the landing zone and the pipeline wherever the platform allows.
Consistent across providers
Posture, identity, logging and workload controls are defined once and applied everywhere, so security does not depend on which platform a team happened to pick.
Illustrative. Scenarios drawn from common engagement patterns.
Accounts multiplying faster than governance
A storage bucket found by someone else
Kubernetes in production with no controls
Privacy engineered in, not written on.
Privacy compliance fails when it stops at policy. The obligations that create real exposure - knowing what personal data you hold, being able to delete it, proving consent, notifying a breach inside the deadline - are engineering problems in a legal wrapper. Gryffin handles both sides: the assessment and documentation regulators expect, and the technical work that makes the commitments true.
What the engagement covers.
Data discovery and mapping
Identifying personal data across systems, including the copies in analytics, backups, spreadsheets and third-party platforms, and recording it in a maintainable Record of Processing Activities.
Lawful basis and consent design
Establishing and documenting a lawful basis for each processing activity, and designing consent capture, withdrawal and record-keeping that stands up to challenge.
Data subject rights operations
Building the workflow that answers access, correction, erasure and portability requests inside the statutory window - including the technical means to find and delete data across systems.
Cross-border transfer controls
Transfer mapping, mechanism selection, transfer impact assessment and the supplementary technical measures that make a transfer defensible.
DPIAs and privacy by design
Assessment of high-risk processing, and privacy requirements introduced into the design of new systems rather than reviewed after build.
Breach readiness and notification
Detection, assessment, classification and notification workflow built to the applicable deadline, with the decision criteria documented in advance.
What you receive
Discovery that includes the copies
Personal data multiplies into analytics stores, backups, exports and third-party tools. Our mapping covers where it actually ended up, because an erasure commitment you cannot fulfil is worse than none.
Rights requests as an engineering workflow
We build the technical means to locate, export and delete data across systems, not just the policy that promises it. That is the difference between meeting the deadline and explaining why you did not.
Both regimes, one programme
Where you fall under GDPR and India's DPDP framework, we design a single control set that satisfies both and note where the regimes genuinely diverge.
Breach notification rehearsed against the clock
The notification window starts at awareness, not at certainty. We build the decision criteria and rehearse them, so the clock is not spent deciding who decides.
Illustrative. Scenarios drawn from common engagement patterns.
An erasure request that could not be fulfilled
Cross-border processing with no transfer basis
A new product feature with unassessed privacy risk
Detect it early. Recover without paying.
Ransomware is not a single event; it is a campaign with a long, noisy run-up - initial access, credential theft, lateral movement, backup tampering - and only then encryption. Every stage before the last is an opportunity to detect and stop it. Gryffin builds detection across that whole chain, hardens the backups attackers go after first, and tests recovery so the decision about paying never has to be a real one.
What the engagement covers.
Precursor detection
Detection content for the stages that precede encryption: credential dumping, privilege escalation, lateral movement, shadow copy deletion and backup tampering.
Encryption behaviour detection and automated containment
Behavioural detection of mass file modification with automated host isolation, executed within seconds rather than after triage.
Backup immutability and isolation
Review and hardening of backup architecture - immutable copies, isolated credentials, offline or logically air-gapped tiers - because attackers target backups before they encrypt.
Recovery runbooks and testing
Documented recovery procedures with defined recovery objectives, tested against real restore timings rather than assumed ones.
Attack surface reduction
Closing the common initial access routes: exposed remote access, unpatched perimeter services, weak authentication and over-permissive privilege.
Retained incident response
A contracted response capability with committed activation times and pre-authorised containment actions.
What you receive
Detection across the whole chain
Detecting encryption is detecting failure. Our content covers the days of activity that precede it, where stopping the campaign is still cheap.
Backups hardened as a target
Modern ransomware operators find and destroy backups first. We review backup architecture the way an attacker would and harden the paths they use.
Recovery times measured, not estimated
Restore procedures are tested against real data volumes. Organisations routinely discover their assumed recovery time is out by an order of magnitude - better to find that in a test.
Containment that does not wait for approval
Automated isolation on encryption behaviour, under authority agreed in advance. Minutes of delay is the difference between one host and the estate.
Illustrative. Scenarios drawn from common engagement patterns.
Encryption starting at 02:00 on a Sunday
Backups encrypted along with everything else
A board asking whether the company would pay
Questions
Tell us the obligation, the incident or the deadline driving the conversation - the first conversation is a scoping call, not a pitch.
We respond within 12 hours